Facts and myths about violence and self-defense - What ist actually "realistic" for violence prevention?
Medially influenced images of "typical" dangers and violent situations often result in false ideas of violence or threats from violence and corresponding prevention strategies. Even among experts there are partly differing views on self-defense and violence prevention. There is only a partial consensus on definitions of the mentioned phenomena and corresponding didactic concepts for self-defense or violence prevention programs. There are also research deficits in the relevant literature. In this article the results of a qualitative study are to be presented, in which subjective theories and professional knowledge of experts with regard to violence, violence prevention, self-defense and gender-sensitive didactic concepts of self-defense and violence prevention in school are researched. From a methodological point of view, guide interviews were evaluated with the qualitative content analysis according to Gläser, & Laudel (2009).
Views of 12 interviewed experts of different concepts concerning self-defense, violence prevention, victim role, the ability to defend, danger locations, violent situations and existing wrong expectations about violence and self-defense are presented. Finally, based on the results of the study, a 3-level model for self-defense and prevention of violence in everyday life is developed, which complements and expands existing models.
Copyright (c) 2018 Andrea Kraus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0). In short, copyright for articles published in this journal is retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. By virtue of their appearance in this open access journal, articles are free to use, with proper attribution to the author and link to the licensing, in educational, commercial, and non-commercial settings.